Author |
|
admin Site Admin

Joined: 15 Oct 2005 Posts: 663
|
|
Back to top |
|
Steffen Moderator
Joined: 15 Oct 2005 Posts: 3008 Location: Hilversum, NL, EU
|
|
Back to top |
|
admin Site Admin

Joined: 15 Oct 2005 Posts: 663
|
Posted: Mon 17 Jun '19 14:43 Post subject: |
|
|
Now 1.2.46 VS16 available |
|
Back to top |
|
muentzer
Joined: 01 May 2006 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Mon 14 Dec '20 0:08 Post subject: Request for mod_jk 1.2.48 |
|
|
Could you please supply a binary (VS16, 64bit) of mod_jk 1.2.48?
Would be greatly appreciated! |
|
Back to top |
|
Steffen Moderator
Joined: 15 Oct 2005 Posts: 3008 Location: Hilversum, NL, EU
|
Posted: Mon 14 Dec '20 12:19 Post subject: |
|
|
VS16 updated to mod_jk 1.2.48. VC15 on request. |
|
Back to top |
|
abrauer-cpt
Joined: 08 Apr 2022 Posts: 11 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Wed 18 Jan '23 12:35 Post subject: |
|
|
Is it possible that you supply a binary of mod_jk (VS17,64bit)? |
|
Back to top |
|
Steffen Moderator
Joined: 15 Oct 2005 Posts: 3008 Location: Hilversum, NL, EU
|
Posted: Wed 18 Jan '23 13:54 Post subject: |
|
|
Sure. Added. |
|
Back to top |
|
abrauer-cpt
Joined: 08 Apr 2022 Posts: 11 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Wed 18 Jan '23 14:33 Post subject: |
|
|
Many thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
tkwt
Joined: 12 Oct 2022 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Thu 19 Jan '23 8:33 Post subject: Wrong VS version in ReadMe? |
|
|
The readme for mod_jk 1.2.48 for Apache 2.4 Win64 VS17 build states:
Quote: | Build with Visual StudioŽ 2019 (VS16) |
Is the (VS16) part intentional, or meant to be (VS17)? |
|
Back to top |
|
Steffen Moderator
Joined: 15 Oct 2005 Posts: 3008 Location: Hilversum, NL, EU
|
Posted: Thu 19 Jan '23 9:40 Post subject: |
|
|
Oeps.. forgot to update that line. Yes, it is build with VS17. |
|
Back to top |
|