| Author |
|
lunter
Joined: 12 May 2011
Posts: 10
|
 Posted: Thu 08 Mar '12 9:18 Post subject: compile mod_spdy ? |
 |
|
Is it posible to compile mod_spdy ??
This is new protocol 2x faster than http and pupported by Chrome, Firefox and Opera.
http://code.google.com/p/mod-spdy/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
gijs
Joined: 27 Apr 2012
Posts: 189
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Fri 27 Apr '12 14:37 Post subject: |
|
|
I had the same question  , I would like to see this on the windows version off apache  |
|
| Back to top |
|
Steffen
Moderator
Joined: 15 Oct 2005
Posts: 3053
Location: Hilversum, NL, EU
|
| Posted: Fri 27 Apr '12 15:08 Post subject: |
|
|
Mod_spdy needs mod_ssl with NPN support.
NPN is not yet supported in Apache HTTPD mod_ssl. A patch has been submitted to Apache to enable NPN in mod_ssl: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52210
Rather better to wait that this patch is official included in Apache.
Steffen |
|
| Back to top |
|
Kanashii
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 155
Location: Porando
|
| Posted: Sun 24 Jun '12 17:41 Post subject: |
|
|
Patch is ready, Firefox 13 support SPDY Chrome support spdy, twitter,gmail enable spdy
Benefits:
Netcraft create report witch supported Spydy website. Will be funny if lot of pages on Windows Apache will be in this report |
|
| Back to top |
|
crckr
Joined: 26 Apr 2006
Posts: 18
|
| Posted: Mon 25 Jun '12 23:20 Post subject: Speedy |
|
|
Yes, i also was searching for Speedy support, so i just leave my comment here also.
Keep up the good work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
gijs
Joined: 27 Apr 2012
Posts: 189
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Wed 18 Jul '12 18:46 Post subject: |
|
|
Any updates on this matter  |
|
| Back to top |
|
lunter
Joined: 12 May 2011
Posts: 10
|
|
| Back to top |
|
admin
Site Admin
Joined: 15 Oct 2005
Posts: 677
|
| Posted: Fri 14 Jun '13 23:43 Post subject: |
|
|
| Good catch, but it is a proposal in trunk. It is not ported to the 2.4.5 branch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Cy4n1d3
Joined: 22 Apr 2013
Posts: 17
|
| Posted: Mon 24 Jun '13 10:15 Post subject: |
|
|
| Hopefully someone does that soon, it doesn't seem as if Google will port SPDY themselves... |
|
| Back to top |
|
daniel1975
Joined: 05 Feb 2006
Posts: 24
Location: RO, Lugoj
|
| Posted: Wed 31 Jul '13 21:09 Post subject: Re: compile mod_spdy ? |
|
|
| lunter wrote: | Is it posible to compile mod_spdy ??
This is new protocol 2x faster than http and pupported by Chrome, Firefox and Opera.
http://code.google.com/p/mod-spdy/ |
Now that 2.4.6 is out, does the NPN made it into Apache so the Windows compiling would be possible ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
glsmith
Moderator
Joined: 16 Oct 2007
Posts: 2268
Location: Sun Diego, USA
|
| Posted: Thu 01 Aug '13 3:03 Post subject: |
|
|
No, the NPN did not make it into 2.4.6. The supplied patch referenced above would not allow mod_ssl to compile on Windows and one dev threatened to remove the code from trunk even. That lit a fire and the problem was addressed.
Still, no one has reissued the proposal for 2.4 as far as I remember, it's still sitting there as stalled. |
|
| Back to top |
|
James Blond
Moderator
Joined: 19 Jan 2006
Posts: 7294
Location: Germany, Next to Hamburg
|
|
| Back to top |
|
glsmith
Moderator
Joined: 16 Oct 2007
Posts: 2268
Location: Sun Diego, USA
|
| Posted: Sat 23 Nov '13 9:39 Post subject: |
|
|
| Reading all the comments and not just Jim's, it doesn't look like mod_spdy project is serious about addressing the issues. Not only that, even if they did (since NPN is in Apache Trunk), who says it's going to build on Windows. Looking through other comments throughout the projects website, when anyone asks about mod_spdy on Windows, all you hear are crickets. |
|
| Back to top |
|
gijs
Joined: 27 Apr 2012
Posts: 189
Location: The Netherlands
|
|
| Back to top |
|
daniel1975
Joined: 05 Feb 2006
Posts: 24
Location: RO, Lugoj
|
| Posted: Thu 20 Mar '14 13:14 Post subject: mod-spdy and new Apache 2.4.9 ? |
|
|
| Is complying mod-spdy possible w. new Apache 2.4.9 ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
