Keep Server Online
If you find the Apache Lounge, the downloads and overall help useful, please express your satisfaction with a donation.
or
A donation makes a contribution towards the costs, the time and effort that's going in this site and building.
Thank You! Steffen
Your donations will help to keep this site alive and well, and continuing building binaries. Apache Lounge is not sponsored.
| |
|
 Topic: Consequence of Win32DisableAcceptEx fix? |
|
| Author |
|
glsmith
Moderator
Joined: 16 Oct 2007
Posts: 2268
Location: Sun Diego, USA
|
 Posted: Tue 08 Jan '08 9:18 Post subject: Consequence of Win32DisableAcceptEx fix? |
 |
|
It seems 2.2.7 fixed the need for Win32DisableAcceptEx which if I remember correctly was considered a bug? I may be wrong here, so much too fast for my brain. I share the conf files between all 2.2 versions loaded and have noticed that config for 2.2.6 does not work with 2.2.7 for the sole fact of Win32DisableAcceptEx. With AcceptEx disabled (as was with 2.2.6), Apache serving process/es crash, leaving listener running fine. They hang around before they exit abnormally yet never serve any content.
Now although I prefer having AcceptEX enabled (I think), I think it should just be continuing to pollute the error log, not crash. Consequence from the bugfix?
Event log indicates problem in libaprutil
Event Type: Error
Event Source: Application Error
Event Category: (100)
Event ID: 1000
Date: 1/7/2008
Time: 10:41:51 PM
Description:
Faulting application httpd.exe, version 2.2.7.0, faulting module libaprutil-1.dll, version 1.2.12.0, fault address 0x00001ce6.
Side note: Was it just my tarball that didn't include required arp-iconv in srclib? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Steffen
Moderator
Joined: 15 Oct 2005
Posts: 3053
Location: Hilversum, NL, EU
|
|
| Back to top |
|
glsmith
Moderator
Joined: 16 Oct 2007
Posts: 2268
Location: Sun Diego, USA
|
| Posted: Tue 08 Jan '08 19:07 Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Steffen, I'll check out the patches on that topic,. Looking at it I did add that patch. Looking at the source file I see it there but commented out. I shouldn't do these things in the evening I guess.
I knew as much as to go get the apr-iconv package and add it, just wondering why if it is required to compile, it is not included in the tarball, or is it a win32 things only? No, there is unix source there so it cannot be win32 only. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
